Chapter 21 References

Borsboom, D., Cramer, A. O. J., Kievit, R. A., Scholten, A. Z., & Franić, S. (2009). The end of construct validity. In The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions, and applications (pp. 135–170). IAP Information Age Publishing.
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Heerden, J. van. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
Devezer, B., Nardin, L. G., Baumgaertner, B., & Buzbas, E. O. (2019). Scientific discovery in a model-centric framework: Reproducibility, innovation, and epistemic diversity. PLOS ONE, 14(5), e0216125. https://doi.org/gf86cs
Eronen, M. I., & Bringmann, L. F. (2021). The Theory Crisis in Psychology: How to Move Forward. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1745691620970586. https://doi.org/ghw2x3
Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (2014). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1272–1280. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037714
Kane, M. (2013). The Argument-Based Approach to Validation. School Psychology Review, 42(4), 448–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087465
Muthukrishna, M., & Henrich, J. (2016). Innovation in the collective brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1690), 20150192. https://doi.org/gfzkmd
Ogden, J. (2016). Celebrating variability and a call to limit systematisation: The example of the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy and the Behaviour Change Wheel. Health Psychology Review, 10(3), 245–250. https://doi.org/gh25r5
Peterson, C. H., Peterson, N. A., & Powell, K. G. (2017). Cognitive Interviewing for Item Development: Validity Evidence Based on Content and Response Processes. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50(4), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1339564
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819322
Willis, G. B. (1999). Cognitive Interviewing. A "how to" guide. Evaluation, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.9
Woolley, M. E., Bowen, G. L., & Bowen, N. K. (2006). The Development and Evaluation of Procedures to Assess Child Self-Report Item Validity Educational and Psychological Measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 687–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282467
Zollman, K. J. S. (2010). The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity. Erkenntnis, 72(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/dnjk7f
Zörgő, S., & Hernández, O. (2018). Patient Journeys of Nonintegration in Hungary: A Qualitative Study of Possible Reasons for Considering Medical Modalities as Mutually Exclusive. Integrative Cancer Therapies, 17(4), 1270–1284.
Zörgő, S., Peters, G., Porter, C., Moraes, M., Donegan, S., & Eagan, B. (2022). Methodology in the Mirror: A Living, Systematic Review of Works in Quantitative Ethnography. In Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. (Vol. 1522, pp. 144–159). Springer, Nature.