Chapter 21 References

Babbie, E. (2007). The Practice of Social Research. Wadsworth.
Borsboom, D., Cramer, A. O. J., Kievit, R. A., Scholten, A. Z., & Franić, S. (2009). The end of construct validity. In The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions, and applications (pp. 135–170). IAP Information Age Publishing.
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Heerden, J. van. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071.
Bressler, D., Bodzin, A., Eagan, B., & Tabatabai, S. (2019). Using epistemic network analysis to examine discourse and scientific practice during a collaborative game. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(5), 553–566.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
Devezer, B., Nardin, L. G., Baumgaertner, B., & Buzbas, E. O. (2019). Scientific discovery in a model-centric framework: Reproducibility, innovation, and epistemic diversity. PLOS ONE, 14(5), e0216125.
Eronen, M. I., & Bringmann, L. F. (2021). The Theory Crisis in Psychology: How to Move Forward. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1745691620970586.
Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (2014). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1272–1280.
Kane, M. (2013). The Argument-Based Approach to Validation. School Psychology Review, 42(4), 448–457.
Maul, A. (2017). Rethinking Traditional Methods of Survey Validation. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 15(2), 51–69.
Muthukrishna, M., & Henrich, J. (2016). Innovation in the collective brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1690), 20150192.
Ogden, J. (2016). Celebrating variability and a call to limit systematisation: The example of the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy and the Behaviour Change Wheel. Health Psychology Review, 10(3), 245–250.
Peters, G.-J. Y., & Crutzen, R. (2017). Pragmatic nihilism: How a Theory of Nothing can help health psychology progress. Health Psychology Review, 11(2).
Peterson, C. H., Peterson, N. A., & Powell, K. G. (2017). Cognitive Interviewing for Item Development: Validity Evidence Based on Content and Response Processes. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50(4), 217–223.
Ruis, A. R., Rosser, A. A., Quandt-Walle, C., Nathwani, J. N., Shaffer, D. W., & Pugh, C. M. (2018). The hands and head of a surgeon: Modeling operative competency with multimodal epistemic network analysis. American Journal of Surgery, 216(5), 835–840.
Shaffer, D. (2017). Quantitative Ethnography.
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366.
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53–80). Sage Publications.
Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge University Press.
Willis, G. B. (1999). Cognitive Interviewing. A "how to" guide. Evaluation, 1–37.
Woolley, M. E., Bowen, G. L., & Bowen, N. K. (2006). The Development and Evaluation of Procedures to Assess Child Self-Report Item Validity Educational and Psychological Measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 687–700.
Zollman, K. J. S. (2010). The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity. Erkenntnis, 72(1), 17–35.
Zörgő, S., & Hernández, O. (2018). Patient Journeys of Nonintegration in Hungary: A Qualitative Study of Possible Reasons for Considering Medical Modalities as Mutually Exclusive. Integrative Cancer Therapies, 17(4), 1270–1284.
Zörgő, S., & Peters, G.-J. Y. (2019). Epistemic Network Analysis for Semi-structured Interviews and Other Continuous Narratives: Challenges and Insights. In B. Eagan, M. Misfeldt, & A. Siebert-Evenstone (Eds.), International Conference on Quantitative Ethnography (pp. 267–277). Springer.
Zörgő, S., Peters, G., Porter, C., Moraes, M., Donegan, S., & Eagan, B. (2022). Methodology in the Mirror: A Living, Systematic Review of Works in Quantitative Ethnography. In Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. (Vol. 1522, pp. 144–159). Springer, Nature.
Zörgő, S., Purebl, G., & Zana, Á. (2018). A Qualitative Study of Culturally Embedded Factors in Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine.