Chapter 18 References

Babbie, E. 2007. The Practice of Social Research. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Borsboom, Denny, Angélique O J Cramer, Rogier A. Kievit, Annemarie Zand Scholten, and Sanja Franić. 2009. “The End of Construct Validity.” In The Concept of Validity: Revisions, New Directions, and Applications, 135–70. IAP Information Age Publishing.
Borsboom, Denny, Gideon J. Mellenbergh, and Jaap van Heerden. 2004. “The Concept of Validity.” Psychological Review 111 (4): 1061–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061.
Bressler, DM, AM Bodzin, B Eagan, and S Tabatabai. 2019. “Using Epistemic Network Analysis to Examine Discourse and Scientific Practice During a Collaborative Game.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 28 (5): 553–66.
Denzin, NK, and YS Lincoln. 2000. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Devezer, Berna, Luis G. Nardin, Bert Baumgaertner, and Erkan Ozge Buzbas. 2019. “Scientific Discovery in a Model-Centric Framework: Reproducibility, Innovation, and Epistemic Diversity.” Edited by Daniele Fanelli. PLOS ONE 14 (5): e0216125. https://doi.org/gf86cs.
Eronen, Markus I., and Laura F. Bringmann. 2021. “The Theory Crisis in Psychology: How to Move Forward.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, January, 1745691620970586. https://doi.org/ghw2x3.
Kane, Michael. 2013. “The Argument-Based Approach to Validation.” Edited by Matthew Burns. School Psychology Review 42 (4): 448–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087465.
Muthukrishna, Michael, and Joseph Henrich. 2016. “Innovation in the Collective Brain.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371 (1690): 20150192. https://doi.org/gfzkmd.
Ogden, Jane. 2016. “Celebrating Variability and a Call to Limit Systematisation: The Example of the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy and the Behaviour Change Wheel.” Health Psychology Review 10 (3): 245–50. https://doi.org/gh25r5.
Peters, Gjalt-Jorn Ygram, and R. Crutzen. 2017. “Pragmatic Nihilism: How a Theory of Nothing Can Help Health Psychology Progress.” Health Psychology Review 11 (2). https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2017.1284015.
Peterson, Christina Hamme, N. Andrew Peterson, and Kristen Gilmore Powell. 2017. “Cognitive Interviewing for Item Development: Validity Evidence Based on Content and Response Processes.” Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 50 (4): 217–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1339564.
Ruis, A. R., Alexandra A. Rosser, Cheyenne Quandt-Walle, Jay N. Nathwani, David Williamson Shaffer, and Carla M. Pugh. 2018. “The Hands and Head of a Surgeon: Modeling Operative Competency with Multimodal Epistemic Network Analysis.” American Journal of Surgery 216 (5): 835–40.
Shaffer, David. 2017. Quantitative Ethnography.
Smith, Jonathan A., and M Osborn. 2008. “Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.” In Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, edited by Jonathan A. Smith, 53–80. London: Sage Publications.
Woolley, Michael E., Gary L. Bowen, and Natasha K. Bowen. 2006. “The Development and Evaluation of Procedures to Assess Child Self-Report Item Validity Educational and Psychological Measurement.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 66 (4): 687–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282467.
Zollman, Kevin J. S. 2010. “The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity.” Erkenntnis 72 (1): 17–35. https://doi.org/dnjk7f.
Zörgő, Szilvia, and Olivas Hernández. 2018. “Patient Journeys of Nonintegration in Hungary: A Qualitative Study of Possible Reasons for Considering Medical Modalities as Mutually Exclusive.” Integrative Cancer Therapies 17 (4): 1270–84.
Zörgő, Szilvia, and Gjalt-Jorn Ygram Peters. 2019. “Epistemic Network Analysis for Semi-Structured Interviews and Other Continuous Narratives: Challenges and Insights.” In International Conference on Quantitative Ethnography, edited by Brendan Eagan, Morten Misfeldt, and Amanda Siebert-Evenstone, 267–77. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33232-7_23.
Zörgő, Szilvia, G Purebl, and Á Zana. 2018. “A Qualitative Study of Culturally Embedded Factors in Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use.” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine.